Tipping Points and Ambiguity in the Integrated Assessment of Climate Change

TitleTipping Points and Ambiguity in the Integrated Assessment of Climate Change
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsLemoine DM, Traeger C
JournalCUDARE Working Paper
Issue1111
Date Published12/2010
Keywordsambiguity aversion, climate change, dynamic programming, integrated assessment, intertemporal substitution, recursive utility, risk aversion, Tipping points, uncertainty
Abstract

The threat of crossing tipping points in the climate system often serves as an argument for more stringent greenhouse gas emission reductions. We introduce such regime shifts into a recursive relative of the DICE integrated assessment model for determining optimal climate policies. Each period's carbon dioxide concentration determines the probability of crossing a tipping point, and the policymaker re-optimizes once a tipping point occurs. The probability, timing, and knowledge of tipping points are endogenous. Our policymaker can also display ambiguity aversion in assessing tipping point uncertainty. We nd that tipping points increase the near-term social cost of carbon by 50-100% when they raise climate sensitivity or make damages more convex. They have less of an e ect when they increase the atmospheric lifetime of CO2 or the quantity of non- CO2 greenhouse gases. Uncertainty about tipping points can reduce their e ect on policy. The possibility of tipping points is more important for the social cost of carbon than is the ambiguity attitude used in their evaluation.

URLhttp://escholarship.org/uc/item/9nd591ww
AttachmentSize
Read the full article1.7 MB