NEWS No need to dam free flowing rivers to meet worlds climate and energy targets

Orig­i­nal­ly pub­lished in Mongabay:

  • In a com­ment arti­cle pub­lished in the Nature last month, sci­en­tists argue that an “ener­gy future in which both peo­ple and rivers thrive” is pos­si­ble with bet­ter planning.
  • The hydropow­er devel­op­ment projects now under­way threat­en the world’s last free-flow­ing rivers, pos­ing severe threats to local human com­mu­ni­ties and the species that call rivers home. A recent study found that just one-third of the world’s 242 largest rivers remain free-flowing.
  • The ben­e­fits of bet­ter plan­ning to meet increas­ing ener­gy demands could be huge: A report released by WWF and The Nature Con­ser­van­cy ahead of the World Hydropow­er Con­gress, held in Paris last month, finds that accel­er­at­ing the deploy­ment of non-hydropow­er renew­able ener­gy could pre­vent the frag­men­ta­tion of near­ly 165,000 kilo­me­ters (more than 102,500 miles) of riv­er channels.

In a com­ment arti­cle pub­lished in the Nature last month, sci­en­tists argue that an “ener­gy future in which both peo­ple and rivers thrive” is pos­si­ble with bet­ter planning.

For decades, hydropow­er dams have been a go-to solu­tion for elec­tri­fy­ing the devel­op­ing world. There are more than 60,000 large dams around the globe, and as the demand for clean ener­gy in Africa, South Amer­i­ca, and South­east Asia con­tin­ues to grow, hun­dreds more are cur­rent­ly in the plan­ning stages.

Hydro­elec­tric dams have their advan­tages, such as pro­vid­ing a steady sup­ply of base­load elec­tric­i­ty that can be adjust­ed quick­ly to meet fluc­tu­at­ing demand and zero haz­ardous wastes or byprod­ucts to dis­pose of. But accord­ing to the authors of the Nature arti­cle, by Rafael J. P. Schmitt at Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty, Noah Kit­tner, Matthias Kon­dolf, and Daniel M Kam­men of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, at Berke­ley “Hydropow­er needs to be viewed as part of a broad­er strat­e­gy for clean ener­gy, in which the costs and ben­e­fits of dif­fer­ent sources should be assessed and weighed against each other.”

The hydropow­er devel­op­ment projects now under­way threat­en the world’s last free-flow­ing rivers, pos­ing severe threats to local human com­mu­ni­ties and the species that call rivers home. The Cam­bo­di­an gov­ern­ment, for instance, is propos­ing to build the 11,000-gigawatt-hour Sam­bor dam on the Mekong Riv­er, which “would pre­vent fish from migrat­ing, threat­en­ing fish­eries worth bil­lions of dol­lars. It would fur­ther cut the sup­ply of sed­i­ment to the Mekong Delta, where some of the region’s most fer­tile farm­land is at risk of sink­ing below sea lev­el by the end of the cen­tu­ry,” accord­ing to Schmitt and col­leagues. “And the dam would do lit­tle to bring elec­tric­i­ty or jobs to local vil­lagers: much of its hydropow­er would be export­ed to big cities in neigh­bour­ing nations, far from the rivers that will be affected.”

A recent study found that just one-third of the world’s 242 largest rivers remain free-flow­ing, most­ly in remote regions of the Ama­zon Basin, the Arc­tic, and the Con­go Basin.

As Schmitt and co-authors note in the Nature arti­cle, how­ev­er, hydropow­er is just one of many clean ener­gy options avail­able today, and tech­nolo­gies like solar pan­els or wind tur­bines can pro­duce sim­i­lar amounts of elec­tric­i­ty as large hydro­elec­tric dams at rough­ly the same cost.

[S]preading a vari­ety of renew­able ener­gy sources strate­gi­cal­ly across riv­er basins could pro­duce pow­er reli­ably and cheap­ly while pro­tect­ing these cru­cial rivers and their local com­mu­ni­ties,” the researchers write. “Solar, wind, micro­hy­dro and ener­gy-stor­age tech­nolo­gies have caught up with large hydropow­er in price and effec­tive­ness. Hun­dreds of small gen­er­a­tors woven into a ‘smart grid’ (which auto­mat­i­cal­ly responds to changes in sup­ply and demand) can out­com­pete a big dam.”

Schmitt and team say that, in order to keep the world’s remain­ing free-flow­ing rivers unob­struct­ed while increas­ing access to elec­tric­i­ty in devel­op­ing nations at the same time, strate­gies for deploy­ing renew­able ener­gy tech­nolo­gies and expand­ing hydropow­er projects must be made at the basin-wide or region­al lev­el and strike the right bal­ance between impacts and ben­e­fits of all avail­able clean elec­tric­i­ty gen­er­a­tion meth­ods. “On the major trib­u­taries of the low­er Mekong, for exam­ple, dams have been built ad hoc. Exist­ing ones exploit only 50% of the trib­u­taries’ poten­tial hydropow­er yet pre­vent 90% of their sand load from reach­ing the delta,” the researchers report. “There was a bet­ter alter­na­tive: plac­ing more small dams high­er up the rivers could have released 70% of the pow­er while trap­ping only 20% of the sand.”

Site selec­tion for solar and wind farms must be just as strate­gic as for new dams. “Impacts of these projects on the land­scape need to be con­sid­ered, too. Solar and wind farms might be built on patch­es of land that have low con­ser­va­tion val­ue, such as along roads, or even float­ing on hydropow­er reser­voirs,” Schmitt and co-authors sug­gest. “Solar pan­els and small wind tur­bines can be put on or near build­ings to min­i­mize infra­struc­ture and reduce ener­gy loss­es in transmission.”

The sci­en­tists rec­om­mend that orga­ni­za­tions and gov­ern­ments who man­age riv­er basins apply a “holis­tic per­spec­tive” to ener­gy plan­ning that takes into account all non-hydropow­er renew­able ener­gy options, ener­gy effi­cien­cy mea­sures, ener­gy demand man­age­ment, and the risks posed by glob­al cli­mate change — as decreas­ing riv­er flows in a more drought-prone, warmer world could severe­ly impact the out­put of hydro­elec­tric dams.

But in order to prop­er­ly eval­u­ate all of the trade-offs when design­ing a renew­able ener­gy strat­e­gy, we need to know much more about riv­er ecosys­tems and the human com­mu­ni­ties that depend on them: “Researchers need to fill data gaps across whole riv­er basins, from fish migra­tion and sed­i­ment trans­port to com­mu­ni­ty empow­er­ment and impacts on food sys­tems,” Schmitt and co-authors write. “The costs of lost ecosys­tem ser­vices over the life cycle of ener­gy projects must be includ­ed in cost–benefit analy­ses. Such research is cheap com­pared with the costs of build­ing dams and mit­i­gat­ing envi­ron­men­tal impacts.”

The ben­e­fits of bet­ter plan­ning to meet increas­ing ener­gy demands could be huge: A report released by WWF and The Nature Con­ser­van­cy ahead of the World Hydropow­er Con­gress, held in Paris last month, finds that accel­er­at­ing the deploy­ment of non-hydropow­er renew­able ener­gy could pre­vent the frag­men­ta­tion of near­ly 165,000 kilo­me­ters (more than 102,500 miles) of riv­er channels.

We can not only envi­sion a future where elec­tric­i­ty sys­tems are acces­si­ble, afford­able and pow­er­ing economies with a mix of renew­able ener­gy, we can now build that future,” Jeff Opper­man, a fresh­wa­ter sci­en­tist with WWF and lead author of the report, said in a statement.

If we do not rapid­ly seize the oppor­tu­ni­ty to accel­er­ate the renew­able rev­o­lu­tion, unnec­es­sary, high-impact hydropow­er dams could still be built on icon­ic rivers such as the Mekong, Irrawad­dy, and Ama­zon — and dozens or hun­dreds of oth­ers around the world. It would be a great tragedy if the full social and envi­ron­men­tal ben­e­fits of the renew­able rev­o­lu­tion arrived just a few years too late to safe­guard the world’s great rivers and all the diverse ben­e­fits they pro­vide to peo­ple and nature.”

Pamok, Laos. Life along the banks of the Mekong Riv­er. © Nico­las Axel­rod /​ Ruom for WWF.

CITATIONS

• Grill et al. (2019). Map­ping the world’s free-flow­ing rivers. Nature. doi:10.1038/s41586-019‑1111‑9

• Opper­man, J., J. Hart­mann, M. Lam­brides, J.P. Car­val­lo, E. Chapin, S. Baruch-Mor­do, B. Eyler, M. Goi­chot, J. Harou, J. Hepp, D. Kam­men, J. Kieseck­er, A. New­sock, R. Schmitt, M. Thieme, A. Wang, and C. Weber. (2019). Con­nect­ed and flow­ing: a renew­able future for rivers, cli­mate and peo­ple. WWF and The Nature Con­ser­van­cy, Wash­ing­ton, DC.

• Schmitt, R. J., Kit­tner, N., Kon­dolf, G. M., & Kam­men, D. M. (2019). Deploy diverse renew­ables to save trop­i­cal rivers. Nature 569, 330–332. doi:10.1038/d41586-019–01498‑8

Browse News

Main Menu
RAEL Info

Energy & Resources Group
310 Barrows Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-3050
Phone: (510) 642-1640
Fax: (510) 642-1085
Email: ergdeskb@berkeley.edu


Projects

  • Open the Main Menu
  • People at RAEL

  • Open the Main Menu