Archive of Topic: Renewable energy and development; R&D policy

Castro Alvarez , Fernando

Is a Doc­tor of Judi­cial Sci­ence Can­di­date at Berke­ley Law, con­duct­ing research on the diver­si­fi­ca­tion of ener­gy sources through law and pol­i­cy, for which he has received a Nation­al Ener­gy Fel­low­ship from the CONACYT-SENER Hydro­car­bons Fund of Mexico.

Dur­ing his path through grad­u­ate school he has worked as a Grad­u­ate Stu­dent Researcher in the Renew­able and Appro­pri­ate Ener­gy Lab­o­ra­to­ry, and has found­ed “Entwick­lung von Energiepro­jek­ten, S.A. de C.V.” a Mex­i­can con­sul­tan­cy firm spe­cial­ized in eval­u­at­ing the fea­si­bil­i­ty of ener­gy projects and devel­op­ing ener­gy research.

Before com­ing to Berke­ley Fer­nan­do worked in pub­lic ser­vice, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the Mex­i­can Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment, where he served as Deputy Legal Direc­tor of Judi­cial Career Analy­sis in the Fed­er­al Judi­cia­ry Coun­cil, and as Deputy Legal Direc­tor of Pub­lic Debt for the Mex­i­can Min­istry of Finance and Pub­lic Credit.

Fer­nan­do holds a Bach­e­lors of Laws from ITAM (Insti­tu­to Tec­no­logi­co Autonomo de Mex­i­co), and a Mas­ter of Laws with a cer­ti­fi­ca­tion in Ener­gy and Clean Tech­nol­o­gy from Berke­ley Law.

 

Deborah Sunter

Before join­ing RAEL in Octo­ber 2015 Dr. Deb­o­rah A. Sunter was a AAAS Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy Pol­i­cy Fel­low at the Depart­ment of Ener­gy: Advanced Man­u­fac­tur­ing Office.

Her inter­ests include renew­able ener­gy sys­tems, advanced man­u­fac­tur­ing tech­niques, and the inter­ac­tion of sci­ence and pol­i­cy in acad­e­mia, indus­try and government.

She received a B.S in Mechan­i­cal and Aero­space Engi­neer­ing at Cor­nell Uni­ver­si­ty. There she devel­oped a nanosatel­lite mis­sion that was suc­cess­ful­ly launched into orbit. Although fas­ci­nat­ed by aero­space appli­ca­tions, the time-crit­i­cal issue of glob­al warm­ing shift­ed her focus in grad­u­ate school to explore renew­able ener­gy. Spe­cial­iz­ing in com­pu­ta­tion­al mod­el­ing of ther­mo-physics in mul­ti­phase sys­tems, she devel­oped a nov­el solar absorber tube and received her Ph.D. in Mechan­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Berke­ley. The need for a glob­al envi­ron­men­tal solu­tion led her to do research abroad in both Japan and China.

Dr. Sunter is both a BIDS, Berke­ley Insti­tute for Data Sci­ences, Fel­low, and will begin as an Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor of Mechan­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at Tufts Uni­ver­si­ty in July 2018.

Cur­rent posi­tion:

Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor, Civ­il and Envi­ron­men­tal Engi­neer­ing, Tufts University

Shiraishi, Kenji

Ken­ji is a Ph.D. stu­dent with the Gold­man School of Pub­lic Pol­i­cy and a researcher in the Renew­able and Appro­pri­ate Ener­gy Lab­o­ra­to­ry. His cur­rent research inter­ests include empir­i­cal stud­ies and quan­ti­ta­tive mod­el­ing on the effec­tive­ness of renew­able ener­gy poli­cies in devel­op­ing and devel­oped coun­tries for effec­tive deci­sion mak­ing. He is also inter­est­ed in devel­op­ing bet­ter tools for quan­ti­ta­tive assess­ment of the mul­ti­ple ben­e­fits of cli­mate poli­cies such as ener­gy access, job cre­ation, and tech­nol­o­gy devel­op­ment and transfer.

Ken­ji has more than 10 years of pro­fes­sion­al expe­ri­ences in the area of Japan’s and inter­na­tion­al envi­ron­men­tal poli­cies as a Deputy Direc­tor for Mar­ket-based Cli­mate Pol­i­cy of the Japan­ese Min­istry of the Envi­ron­ment, a Man­ag­ing Direc­tor of the Glob­al Envi­ron­ment Cen­tre Foun­da­tion, etc. For exam­ple, he has spear­head­ed and man­aged var­i­ous gov­ern­ment ener­gy incen­tive pro­grams for fund­ing ener­gy effi­cient and renew­able ener­gy projects in Japan as well as in South­east Asia and Africa under the Joint Cred­it­ing Mech­a­nism, bilat­er­al coop­er­a­tion scheme between 14 coun­tries and Japan­ese Gov­ern­ment. He has also ini­ti­at­ed and led inter­na­tion­al coop­er­a­tion ini­tia­tives on envi­ron­men­tal pol­i­cy plan­ning, capac­i­ty build­ing, and tech­nol­o­gy trans­fer focused on low-car­bon city devel­op­ment with Japan­ese munic­i­pal­i­ties for Ho Chi Minh City (Viet­nam), Vien­tiane (Lao PDR), and oth­er cities. He has nego­ti­at­ed at COP 18 and 19 of the UNFCCC as an inter­na­tion­al nego­tia­tor of the Japan­ese del­e­ga­tion on tech­nol­o­gy trans­fer. Out­side of envi­ron­men­tal poli­cies, he is a cre­ator and a lead­ing train­er of pol­i­cy analy­sis train­ing cours­es for Japan­ese pol­i­cy professionals.

He holds an MPP with the Smolen­sky Prize (the Best Advanced Pol­i­cy Analy­sis (master’s the­sis)) from UC Berke­ley, for which Dan Kam­men was his APA advi­sor.  Ken­ji has a MEng and a BEng in Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing from Uni­ver­si­ty of Tokyo.

SMART VILLAGES: New thinking for off-grid communities worldwide

 

 

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Key­words: off-grid ener­gy; vil­lage pow­er; decen­tral­ized ener­gy, ener­gy ser­vices, ener­gy innovation.

 Overview:

Two crit­i­cal­ly impor­tant and inter­linked chal­lenges face the glob­al com­mu­ni­ty in the 21st cen­tu­ry: the per­sis­tence of wide­spread ener­gy pover­ty and the result­ing lost eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty; and inten­si­fy­ing human-dri­ven cli­mate dis­rup­tion. These crises are inex­orably linked through the ener­gy tech­nol­o­gy sys­tems that have so far pro­vid­ed the vast major­i­ty of our ener­gy: bio­mass and fos­sil fuels. Both the ener­gy ser­vice cri­sis and the cli­mate cri­sis have become increas­ing­ly seri­ous over the past decades, even though we have seen greater clar­i­ty over the indi­vid­ual and social costs that each has brought to humanity.

 

The Sus­tain­able Ener­gy Imperative:

The cor­re­la­tion between access to elec­tric­i­ty and a wide range of social goods is over­whelm­ing. How­ev­er, access to improved ener­gy ser­vices alone does not pro­vide a sure­fire path­way to eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty and an improved qual­i­ty of life. In Fig­ure 2 we show the cor­re­la­tions that exist between elec­tric­i­ty access across nations and a vari­ety of mea­sures of qual­i­ty of life, such as the Human Devel­op­ment Index (a mea­sure of well-being based in equal thirds on gross nation­al income, life expectan­cy, and edu­ca­tion­al attain­ment). Oth­er indi­ca­tors stud­ied include gen­der equal­i­ty in edu­ca­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ty, and the per­cent­age of stu­dents who reach edu­ca­tion­al mile­stones. All of these indices improve sig­nif­i­cant­ly and rough­ly lin­ear­ly with access to elec­tric­i­ty. At the same time, the per­cent­age of peo­ple below the pover­ty line, and child­hood mor­tal­i­ty, both decline with increas­ing ener­gy access1.

 

 

 

Fig­ure 1: A vil­lage micro-grid ener­gy and telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sys­tem in the Crock­er High­lands of Sabah, Malaysian Bor­neo. The sys­tem serves a com­mu­ni­ty of two hun­dred, and pro­vides house­hold ener­gy ser­vices, tele­coms and satel­lite (dish shown), water pump­ing for fish ponds (seen at cen­ter) and for refrig­er­a­tion. The sup­ply includes micro-hydro and solar gen­er­a­tion (one small pan­el shown here, oth­ers are dis­trib­uted on build­ing rooftops). Pho­to cred­it: Daniel M. Kammen.

 Fig­ure 2: The Human Devel­op­ment Index (HDI) and var­i­ous addi­tion­al met­rics of qual­i­ty of life plot­ted against the per­cent­age of the pop­u­la­tion with elec­tric­i­ty access. Each data point is coun­try lev­el data a spe­cif­ic point in time. For addi­tion­al data, see Alston, Ger­shen­son, and Kam­men, 20151.

 

Today the gap between glob­al pop­u­la­tion and those with elec­tric­i­ty access stands at rough­ly 1.3 bil­lion, with ener­gy ser­vices for the unelec­tri­fied com­ing large­ly from kerosene and tra­di­tion­al bio­mass, includ­ing dung and agri­cul­tur­al residues. This ‘access gap’ has per­sist­ed as grid expan­sion pro­grammes and pop­u­la­tion have grown.

 

Grid expan­sion has rough­ly kept pace with the increase in the glob­al pop­u­la­tion. About 1.4 bil­lion peo­ple in 2013 are com­plete­ly off-grid, and many osten­si­bly con­nect­ed peo­ple in the devel­op­ing world expe­ri­ence sig­nif­i­cant out­ages that range from 20–200+ days a year.   The major­i­ty of these off-grid res­i­dents are in rur­al and under­served peri-urban areas. Cur­rent fore­casts are that this num­ber will remain rough­ly unchanged until 2030, which would rel­e­gate a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion and the economies of many of the need­i­est coun­tries on earth to frag­ile, under­pro­duc­tive lives with less options than they could oth­er­wise have. Tra­di­tion­al grid exten­sion will be slow­est to reach these com­mu­ni­ties. Unless the advances in both ener­gy and infor­ma­tion sys­tems that have occurred over the past decade are more wide­ly adopt­ed, there will be lit­tle if any chance to alter this trend.

 

Advances in off-grid systems 

Recent­ly we have seen an emer­gence of off-grid elec­tric­i­ty sys­tems that do not require the same sup­port­ing net­works as the tra­di­tion­al forms of cen­tral­ized pow­er gen­er­a­tion. These tech­no­log­i­cal inno­va­tions are as much based on infor­ma­tion sys­tems as they are direct­ly about ener­gy tech­nol­o­gy. While tra­di­tion­al elec­tric­i­ty grids can grad­u­al­ly pay off (amor­tize) the costs of expen­sive gen­er­a­tion, trans­mis­sion and dis­tri­b­u­tion cap­i­tal equip­ment across many cus­tomers and across many decades, a new busi­ness mod­el is need­ed to rapid­ly bring ener­gy ser­vices to the rur­al and urban poor. Mini-grids and prod­ucts for indi­vid­ual user end-use such as solar home sys­tems have ben­e­fit­ted from dra­mat­ic price reduc­tions and per­for­mance advances in sol­id state elec­tron­ics, cel­lu­lar com­mu­ni­ca­tions tech­nolo­gies, elec­tron­ic bank­ing, and in the dra­mat­ic decrease in solar ener­gy costs2. This mix of tech­no­log­i­cal and mar­ket inno­va­tion has con­tributed to a vibrant new ener­gy ser­vices sec­tor that in many nations has out­paced tra­di­tion­al grid expansion.

 

The com­par­i­son between the util­i­ty mod­el of cen­tral-sta­tion ener­gy sys­tems and this new wave of dis­trib­uted ener­gy providers is instruc­tive. Tra­di­tion­al dynamo gen­er­a­tors and arc light­ing per­form best at large scale, and they became the main­stay of large-scale elec­tric util­i­ties. The clas­sic util­i­ty mod­el of a one-way flow of ener­gy from pow­er plant to con­sumers is now rapid­ly chang­ing.   The com­bi­na­tion of low-cost solar, micro-hydro, and oth­er gen­er­a­tion tech­nolo­gies cou­pled with the elec­tron­ics need­ed to man­age small-scale pow­er and to com­mu­ni­cate to con­trol devices and to remote billing sys­tems has changed vil­lage ener­gy. High-per­for­mance, low-cost pho­to­volta­ic gen­er­a­tion, paired with advanced bat­ter­ies and con­trollers, pro­vide scal­able sys­tems across much larg­er pow­er ranges than cen­tral gen­er­a­tion, from megawatts down to frac­tions of a watt3.

 

The rapid and con­tin­u­ing improve­ments in end-use effi­cien­cy for sol­id state light­ing, direct cur­rent tele­vi­sions, refrig­er­a­tion, fans, and infor­ma­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tion tech­nol­o­gy (ICT, as seen in Fig­ure 1) have result­ed in a ‘super-effi­cien­cy trend’. This progress has enabled decen­tral­ized pow­er and appli­ance sys­tems to com­pete with con­ven­tion­al equip­ment for basic house­hold needs. These rapid tech­no­log­i­cal advances in sup­port­ing clean ener­gy both on- and off-grid are fur­ther­more pre­dict­ed to con­tin­ue. This process has been par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant at the indi­vid­ual device and house­hold (solar home sys­tem) lev­el, and for the emerg­ing world of vil­lage mini-grids3.

 

Diverse Tech­nol­o­gy Options to Pro­vide Ener­gy Ser­vices for the Unelectrified:

With these tech­no­log­i­cal cor­ner­stones, aid orga­ni­za­tions, gov­ern­ments, acad­e­mia, and the pri­vate sec­tor are devel­op­ing and sup­port­ing a wide range of approach­es to serve the needs of the poor, includ­ing pico-light­ing devices (often very small 1 – 2 watt solar pan­els charg­ing lithi­um-ion bat­ter­ies which in turn pow­er low-cost/high effi­cien­cy light emit­ting diode lights), solar home sys­tems (SHS), and com­mu­ni­ty-scale micro- and mini-grids. Decen­tral­ized sys­tems are clear­ly not com­plete sub­sti­tutes for a reli­able grid con­nec­tion, but they rep­re­sent an impor­tant lev­el of access until a reli­able grid is avail­able and fea­si­ble. They pro­vide an impor­tant plat­form from which to devel­op more dis­trib­uted ener­gy ser­vices. By over­com­ing access bar­ri­ers often through mar­ket-based struc­tures, these sys­tems pro­vide entire­ly new ways to bring ener­gy ser­vices to the poor and for­mer­ly un-con­nect­ed people.

 

Meet­ing peo­ples’ basic light­ing and com­mu­ni­ca­tion needs is an impor­tant first step on the ‘mod­ern elec­tric­i­ty ser­vice lad­der’ 4. Elim­i­nat­ing kerosene light­ing from a house­hold improves house­hold health and safe­ty while pro­vid­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly high­er qual­i­ty and quan­ti­ties of light. Fuel based light­ing is a $20 bil­lion indus­try in Africa alone, and tremen­dous oppor­tu­ni­ties exist to both reduce ener­gy costs for the poor, and to improve the qual­i­ty of ser­vice. Charg­ing a rur­al or vil­lage cell phone can cost $5 – 10/​kWh at a pay-for-ser­vice charg­ing sta­tion, but less than $0.50 cents/​kWh via an off-grid prod­uct or on a mini-grid.

 

This invest­ment frees income and also tends to lead to high­er rates of uti­liza­tion for mobile phones and oth­er small devices. Over­all, the first few watts of pow­er medi­at­ed through effi­cient end-uses lead to ben­e­fits in house­hold health, edu­ca­tion, and pover­ty reduc­tion. Beyond basic needs there can be a wide range of impor­tant and high­ly-val­ued ser­vices from decen­tral­ized pow­er (e.g., tele­vi­sion, refrig­er­a­tion, fans, heat­ing, ven­ti­la­tion and air-con­di­tion­ing, motor-dri­ven appli­ca­tions) depend­ing on the pow­er lev­el and its qual­i­ty along with demand-side efficiency.

 

Expe­ri­ence with the ‘off-grid’ poor con­firms the excep­tion­al val­ue derived from the first incre­ment of ener­gy service—equivalent to 0.2–1 Wh/​day for mobile phone charg­ing or the first 100 lumen-hours of light. Giv­en the cost and ser­vice lev­el that fuel-based light­ing and fee-based mobile phone charg­ing pro­vide as a base­line, sim­ply shift­ing this expen­di­ture to a range of mod­ern ener­gy tech­nol­o­gy solu­tions could pro­vide a much bet­ter ser­vice, or sig­nif­i­cant cost sav­ings over the life­time of a light­ing prod­uct (typ­i­cal­ly 3–5 years).

 

Mir­ror­ing the ear­ly devel­op­ment of elec­tric util­i­ties, improve­ments in under­ly­ing tech­nol­o­gy sys­tems for decen­tral­ized pow­er are also being com­bined with new busi­ness mod­els, insti­tu­tion­al and reg­u­la­to­ry sup­port, and inte­grat­ed infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy sys­tems5, 6. His­tor­i­cal­ly, the non-tech­ni­cal bar­ri­ers to adop­tion have been imped­i­ments to wide­spread adop­tion of off-grid elec­tric­i­ty, and in some cas­es they still are. A lack of appro­pri­ate invest­ment cap­i­tal also ham­pers the estab­lish­ment and expan­sion of pri­vate sec­tor ini­tia­tives. Fur­ther­more, com­plex and often per­verse pol­i­cy envi­ron­ments impair entry for clean tech­nolo­gies and entrench incum­bent sys­tems. Sub­si­dies for liq­uid light­ing fuels can reduce the incen­tive to adopt elec­tric light­ing. In addi­tion, the preva­lence of imper­fect or inac­cu­rate infor­ma­tion about qual­i­ty can lead to mar­ket spoil­ing4 and is also man­i­fest­ed by a lack of con­sumer under­stand­ing and aware­ness of alter­na­tives to incum­bent light­ing technology.

 

Test­ing lab­o­ra­to­ries that rate the qual­i­ty of the light­ing prod­ucts and dis­sem­i­nate the results are an invalu­able step in increas­ing the qual­i­ty and com­pet­i­tive­ness of new entrants into the off-grid and mini-grid ener­gy ser­vices space. The Light­ing Glob­al (https://​www​.light​ing​glob​al​.org) pro­gramme5 is one exam­ple of an effort that began as an indus­try watch­dog, but has now become an impor­tant plat­form that pro­vides mar­ket insights, steers qual­i­ty assur­ance frame­works for mod­ern, off-grid light­ing devices and sys­tems, and pro­motes sus­tain­abil­i­ty through a part­ner­ship with industry.

 

An Action Agen­da for Ener­gy Access:

The diver­si­ty of new ener­gy ser­vice prod­ucts avail­able, and the rapid­ly increas­ing demand for infor­ma­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tion ser­vices, water, health and enter­tain­ment in vil­lages world­wide has built a very large demand for reli­able and low-cost ener­gy7. Com­bin­ing this demand with the dri­ve for clean ener­gy brings two impor­tant objec­tives that were for many years seen as in direct com­pe­ti­tion with align­ment around the suite of new clean ener­gy prod­ucts that can pow­er vil­lage ener­gy services.

 

To enable and expand this process, a range of design prin­ci­ples emerge that can form a roadmap to clean ener­gy economies:

 

 

  • Estab­lish clear goals at the local lev­el: Uni­ver­sal ener­gy access is the glob­al goal by 20307, but estab­lish­ing more near-term goals that embody mean­ing­ful steps from the present sit­u­a­tion will show how what is pos­si­ble and at what lev­el of effort. Cities and vil­lages have begun with audits of ener­gy ser­vices, costs, and envi­ron­men­tal impacts. A num­ber of tools are often cit­ed as excel­lent start­ing points, includ­ing the cli­mate foot­print assess­ment tools like http://​cool​cli​mate​.berke​ley​.edu, and the HOMER soft­ware pack­age (http://​www​.home​ren​er​gy​.com) used by many groups to design both local mini-grids and to plan and cost out off-grid ener­gy options

 

  • Empow­er vil­lages as both design­ers and as con­sumers of local­ized pow­er: Vil­lage solu­tions nec­es­sar­i­ly vary great­ly, but clean ener­gy resource assess­ments, eval­u­a­tion of the need­ed infra­struc­ture invest­ment, and, most often neglect­ed but most impor­tant, the social struc­tures around which suf­fi­cient train­ing exists to make the vil­lage ener­gy sys­tem a suc­cess.   In a pilot in rur­al Nicaragua, once the assess­ment was com­plete8 move­ment from eval­u­a­tion to imple­men­ta­tion quick­ly became a goal of both the com­mu­ni­ty and a local com­mer­cial plant.

 

  • Make equi­ty a cen­tral design con­sid­er­a­tion: Com­mu­ni­ty ener­gy solu­tions have the poten­tial to lib­er­ate women entre­pre­neurs and dis­ad­van­taged eth­nic minori­ties by tai­lor­ing user-mate­ri­als and ener­gy plans to meet the cul­tur­al and lin­guis­tic needs of these com­mu­ni­ties. Nation­al pro­grammes often ignore busi­ness spe­cial­ties, cul­tur­al­ly appro­pri­ate cook­ing and oth­er home ener­gy needs. Think­ing explic­it­ly about this is both good busi­ness and makes the solu­tions much more like­ly to be adopted.

 

Ref­er­ences & Fur­ther Reading: 

  1.  Alstone, Peter, Ger­shen­son, Dim­it­ry and Daniel K. Kam­men (2015) Decen­tral­ized ener­gy sys­tems for clean elec­tric­i­ty access, , , 305 – 314.
  2. Alstone, Peter, Ger­shen­son, Dim­it­ry and Daniel K. Kam­men (2015) Decen­tral­ized ener­gy sys­tems for clean elec­tric­i­ty access, Nature Cli­mate Change, 5, 305 – 314.
  3. Zheng, Cheng and Kam­men, Daniel (2014) An Inno­va­tion-Focused Roadmap for a Sus­tain­able Glob­al Pho­to­volta­ic Indus­try, Ener­gy Pol­i­cy, 67, 159–169.
  4. Daniel Schnitzer, Deepa Shinde Louns­bury, Juan Pablo Car­val­lo, Ran­jit Desh­mukh, Jay Apt, and Daniel M. Kam­men (2014) Micro­grids for Rur­al Elec­tri­fi­ca­tion: A crit­i­cal review of best prac­tices based on sev­en case stud­ies (Unit­ed Nation­al Foun­da­tion: New York, NY). http://​ener​gy​ac​cess​.org/​i​m​a​g​e​s​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​f​i​l​e​s​/​M​i​c​r​o​g​r​i​d​s​R​e​p​o​r​t​F​I​N​A​L​_​h​i​g​h​.​pdf
  1. Casil­las, C. and Kam­men, D. M. (2010) The ener­gy-pover­ty-cli­mate nexus, Sci­ence, 330, 1182
  2. Azeve­do, I. L., Mor­gan, M. G. & Mor­gan, F. (2009) The tran­si­tion to sol­id-state light­ing. Pro­ceed­ings of the IEEE 97, 481–510 (2009).
  3. Mil­e­va, A., Nel­son, J. H., John­ston, J., and Kam­men, D. M. (2013) Sun­Shot Solar Pow­er Reduces Costs and Uncer­tain­ty in Future Low-Car­bon Elec­tric­i­ty Sys­tems, Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ence & Tech­nol­o­gy, 47 (16), 9053 – 9060.
  4. Sova­cool, B. K. The polit­i­cal econ­o­my of ener­gy pover­ty: A review of key chal­lenges. Ener­gy for Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment 16, 272–282 (2012).
  5. SE4ALL. (2013) Glob­al Track­ing Frame­work (Unit­ed Nations Sus­tain­able Ener­gy For All, New York, NY).

 

Greacen, Chris

Chris Grea­cen has worked on pol­i­cy and hands-on imple­men­ta­tion of renew­able ener­gy from vil­lage to gov­ern­ment lev­els. As co-direc­tor of the non-prof­it orga­ni­za­tion Palang Thai he helped draft Thai­land’s Very Small Pow­er Pro­duc­er (VSPP) poli­cies, which account for over 1200 MW of renew­able ener­gy on-line and addi­tion­al 3700 MW with signed PPAs as of March 2012. He con­duct­ed dozens of stud­ies on renew­able ener­gy and pow­er sec­tor plan­ning and gov­er­nance in Thai­land, includ­ing a gov­ern­ment-com­mis­sioned study that helped shape Thailand’s design of its feed-in tar­iff program.

As a World Bank con­sul­tant he has worked since 2008 with the Tan­zan­ian Ener­gy Water Util­i­ties Reg­u­la­to­ry Author­i­ty (EWURA) to draft guide­lines and rules for Tanzania’s Small Pow­er Pro­duc­er (SPP) pro­gram, which stream­lines deploy­ment of renew­able ener­gy mini-grids for rur­al elec­tri­fi­ca­tion and grid-con­nect­ed renew­able ener­gy to aug­ment Tan­za­ni­a’s nation­al grid.

With the Bor­der Green Ener­gy Team (BGET) he has led instal­la­tion of 13 pico-hydropow­er projects with remote com­mu­ni­ties in the Thai-Bur­ma bor­der area, as well as lead­ing the con­struc­tion of dozens of solar elec­tric sys­tems for remote med­ical clin­ics in east­ern Bur­ma. His PhD dis­ser­ta­tion from the Ener­gy and Resources Group (ERG) at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley focused on micro-hydro­elec­tric­i­ty in rur­al Thai­land. He also has a BA in Physics from Reed Col­lege with a the­sis on solar pho­to­volta­ic semi­con­duc­tor physics. He has worked on renew­able ener­gy projects in Nepal, India, Bur­ma, Cam­bo­dia, Chi­na, Guatemala, Microne­sia, North Korea, Tibet, Van­u­atu, Viet­nam, and on Native Amer­i­can reservations.

Nemet, Greg

Gre­go­ry Nemet is an Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Wisconsin–Madison in the La Fol­lette School of Pub­lic Affairs and the Nel­son Insti­tute’s Cen­ter for Sus­tain­abil­i­ty and the Glob­al Envi­ron­ment. He is also chair of the Ener­gy Analy­sis and Pol­i­cy cer­tifi­cate program

His research and teach­ing focus on improv­ing analy­sis of the glob­al ener­gy sys­tem and, more gen­er­al­ly, on under­stand­ing how to expand access to ener­gy ser­vices while reduc­ing envi­ron­men­tal impacts. He teach­es cours­es in ener­gy sys­tems analy­sis, gov­er­nance of glob­al ener­gy prob­lems, and inter­na­tion­al envi­ron­men­tal policy.

Pro­fes­sor Nemet’s research ana­lyzes the process of tech­no­log­i­cal change in ener­gy and its inter­ac­tions with pub­lic pol­i­cy. These projects fall in two areas: (1) empir­i­cal analy­sis iden­ti­fy­ing the influ­ences on past tech­no­log­i­cal change and (2) mod­el­ing of the effects of pol­i­cy instru­ments on future tech­no­log­i­cal out­comes. The first includes assess­ment of pub­lic pol­i­cy, research and devel­op­ment, learn­ing by doing, and knowl­edge spillovers. An exam­ple of the sec­ond is work inform­ing allo­ca­tion between research and devel­op­ment and demand-side pol­i­cy instru­ments to address cli­mate change.

In 2015, he received the H.I. Romnes Fac­ul­ty Fel­low­ship, which hon­ors out­stand­ing Uni­ver­si­ty of Wis­con­sin-Madi­son fac­ul­ty mem­bers for their research contributions.He has been a con­trib­u­tor to the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change and the Glob­al Ener­gy Assess­ment. He received his doc­tor­ate in ener­gy and resources from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Berke­ley. His A.B. is in geog­ra­phy and eco­nom­ics from Dart­mouth College.

Margolis, Robert

http://​www​.nrel​.gov/​a​n​a​l​y​s​i​s​/​s​t​a​f​f​/​r​_​m​a​r​g​o​l​i​s​.​h​tml

The Information-Energy Nexus for Energy Access

Distributed energy and information (satellite TV) in Prizren, Kosovo

Dis­trib­uted ener­gy and infor­ma­tion (satel­lite TV) in Prizren, Kosovo

Homes built in Juba, South Sudan showing the lack of infrastructure associated with these new units.

Homes built in Juba, South Sudan show­ing the lack of infra­struc­ture asso­ci­at­ed with these new units.

Making charcoal and mud fuel blocks in Kibera, Kenya

Mak­ing char­coal and mud fuel blocks in Kib­era, Kenya

Hoffacker, Madison

Madi­son K. Hof­fack­er is a full-time Sus­tain­able Ener­gy Research Spe­cial­ist joint­ly with the Ener­gy and Resources Group at UC Berke­ley and the Cen­ter for Con­ser­va­tion Biol­o­gy at UC River­side. Madi­son grad­u­at­ed from Chap­man Uni­ver­si­ty with a degree in Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ence and Pol­i­cy, and pre­vi­ous­ly worked for the Depart­ment of Glob­al Ecol­o­gy at the Carnegie Insti­tu­tion for Sci­ence (Stan­ford, California).

Pub­li­ca­tions:

Her­nan­dez RR, Hof­fack­er MK, Field CB (2015) Effi­cient use of land to meet sus­tain­able ener­gy needs. Nature Cli­mate Change, doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2556 [PDF]                                                                                                                                                                Fea­tured in: The Wash­ing­ton PostECN​mag​.comGrist​.orgCom​put​er​World​.com, and Green​Tech​Me​dia​.com

Her­nan­dez RR, Hof­fack­er MK, Field CB (2014) The Land-Use Effi­cien­cy of Big Solar. Envi­ron­men­tal Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy, doi: 10.1021/es4043726. [PDF]

Funk JL, Hof­fack­er MK, and Matzek V (2014) Sum­mer irri­ga­tion, graz­ing and seed addi­tion dif­fer­en­tial­ly influ­ence com­mu­ni­ty com­po­si­tion in an invad­ed ser­pen­tine grass­land.  [PDF]

Main Menu
RAEL Info

Energy & Resources Group
310 Barrows Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-3050
Phone: (510) 642-1640
Fax: (510) 642-1085
Email: ergdeskb@berkeley.edu


Projects

  • Open the Main Menu
  • People at RAEL

  • Open the Main Menu