PublicationBook Chapter Chapter 3: Energy systems. In Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report

Published:
November 23, 2018
Author(s):
  • Chapter 3: Energy systems. In Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report
  • Marcotullio, P. J., L. Bruhwiler, S. Davis, J. Engel-Cox, J. Field, C. Gately, K. R. Gurney, D. M. Kammen,
  • E. McGlynn, J. McMahon, W. R. Morrow, III, I. B. Ocko, and R. Torrie, 2018: Chapter 3: Energy systems. In Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report [Cavallaro, N., G. Shrestha, R. Birdsey, M. A. Mayes, R. G. Najjar, S. C. Reed, P. Romero-Lankao, and Z. Zhu (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 110-188, https://doi.org/10.7930/SOCCR2.2018.Ch3.
Publication Type:
Book Chapter
Abstract:

KEY FINDINGS

  1. In 2013, pri­ma­ry ener­gy use in North Amer­i­ca exceed­ed 125 exajoules,1 of which Cana­da was respon- sible for 11.9%, Mex­i­co 6.5%, and the Unit­ed States 81.6%. Of total pri­ma­ry ener­gy sources, approxi- mate­ly 81% was from fos­sil fuels, which con­tributed to car­bon diox­ide equiv­a­lent (CO2e)2 emis­sions lev- els, exceed­ing 1.76 peta­grams of car­bon, or about 20% of the glob­al total for ener­gy-relat­ed activ­i­ties. Of these emis­sions, coal account­ed for 28%, oil 44%, and nat­ur­al gas 28% (very high con­fi­dence, likely).
  2. North Amer­i­can ener­gy-relat­ed CO2e emis­sions have declined at an aver­age rate of about 1% per year, or about 19.4 ter­a­grams CO2e, from 2003 to 2014 (very high confidence).
  3. The shifts in North Amer­i­can ener­gy use and CO2e emis­sions have been dri­ven by fac­tors such
    as 1) low­er ener­gy use, ini­tial­ly as a response to the glob­al finan­cial cri­sis of 2007 to 2008 (high con­fi­dence, very like­ly); but increas­ing­ly due to 2) greater ener­gy effi­cien­cy, which has reduced
    the region­al ener­gy inten­si­ty of eco­nom­ic pro­duc­tion by about 1.5% annu­al­ly from 2004 to 2013, enabling eco­nom­ic growth while low­er­ing ener­gy CO2e emis­sions. Ener­gy inten­si­ty has fall­en annu- ally by 1.6% in the Unit­ed States and 1.5% in Cana­da (very high con­fi­dence, very like­ly). Fur­ther fac­tors dri­ving low­er car­bon inten­si­ties include 3) increased renew­able ener­gy pro­duc­tion (up 220 peta- joules annu­al­ly from 2004 to 2013, trans­lat­ing to an 11% annu­al aver­age increase in renew­ables) (high con­fi­dence, very like­ly); 4) a shift to nat­ur­al gas from coal sources for indus­tri­al and elec­tric­i­ty pro­duc­tion (high con­fi­dence, like­ly); and 5) a wide range of new tech­nolo­gies, includ­ing, for exam­ple, alter­na­tive fuel vehi­cles (high con­fi­dence, likely).
  4. A wide range of plau­si­ble futures exists for the North Amer­i­can ener­gy sys­tem in regard to car­bon emis­sions. Fore­casts to 2040, based on cur­rent poli­cies and tech­nolo­gies, sug­gest a range of car­bon emis­sions lev­els from an increase of over 10% to a decrease of over 14% (from 2015 car­bon emis­sions lev­els). Explorato­ry and back­cast­ing approach­es sug­gest that the North Amer­i­can ener­gy sys­tem emis­sions will not decrease by more than 13% (com­pared with 2015 lev­els) with­out both tech­no­log­i­cal advances and changes in pol­i­cy. For the Unit­ed States, how­ev­er, decreas­es in emis­sions could plau­si­bly meet a nation­al con­tri­bu­tion to a glob­al path­way con­sis­tent with a tar­get of warm­ing to 2°C at a cumu- lative cost of $1 tril­lion to $4 tril­lion (US$ 2005).

Note: Con­fi­dence lev­els are pro­vid­ed as appro­pri­ate for quan­ti­ta­tive, but not qual­i­ta­tive, Key Find­ings and statements.

1 One exa­joule is equal to one quin­til­lion (1018) joules, a derived unit of ener­gy in the Inter­na­tion­al Sys­tem of Units.

2 Car­bon diox­ide equiv­a­lent (CO2e): Amount of CO2 that would pro­duce the same effect on the radia­tive bal­ance of Earth’s cli­mate sys­tem as anoth­er green­house gas, such as methane (CH4) or nitrous oxide (N2O), on a 100-year timescale. For com­par­i­son to units of car­bon, each kg CO2e is equiv­a­lent to 0.273 kg C (0.273 = 1/3.67). See Box P.2, p. 12, in the Pref­ace for more details.

 

Rec­om­mend­ed Cita­tion for Chapter

Mar­co­tul­lio, P. J., L. Bruh­wiler, S. Davis, J. Engel-Cox, J. Field, C. Gate­ly, K. R. Gur­ney, D. M. Kammen,
E. McG­lynn, J. McMa­hon, W. R. Mor­row, III, I. B. Ocko, and R. Tor­rie, 2018: Chap­ter 3: Ener­gy sys­tems. InSec­ond State of the Car­bon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sus­tained Assess­ment Report [Cav­al­laro, N., G. Shrestha, R. Bird­sey, M. A. Mayes, R. G. Naj­jar, S. C. Reed, P. Romero-Lankao, and Z. Zhu (eds.)]. U.S. Glob­al Change Research Pro­gram, Wash­ing­ton, DC, USA, pp. 110–188, https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​7​9​3​0​/​S​O​C​C​R​2​.​2​0​1​8​.​Ch3.

Main Menu
RAEL Info

Energy & Resources Group
310 Barrows Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-3050
Phone: (510) 642-1640
Fax: (510) 642-1085
Email: ergdeskb@berkeley.edu


Projects

  • Open the Main Menu
  • People at RAEL

  • Open the Main Menu